مدل‌یابی برنامه درسی پاسخگوی رشته علوم تربیتی (مورد مطالعه: دانشگاه‌های جامع سطح اول ایران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم‌تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه علوم‌تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف: این تحقیق با هدف طراحی و اعتبارسنجی مدل برنامه درسی پاسخگو در دوره کارشناسی علوم تربیتی در دانشگاه‌های جامع سطح اول ایران انجام شد.
روش پژوهش: در این پژوهش از روش آمیخته اکتشافی متوالی استفاده شد (رویکرد کیفی از نوع تحلیل محتوا و رویکرد کمی از نوع پیمایشی). مشارکت‌کنندگان پژوهش در بخش کیفی، اعضای هیأت علمی متخصص و صاحبنظر در حوزه برنامه‌ریزی درسی و خبرگان حوزه برنامه‌ریزی آموزش عالی و دانشگاه بودند که از این میان، 18 نفر به عنوان نمونه هدفمند انتخاب شدند. همچنین، جامعه آماری در بخش کمی، شامل کلیه اعضای هیئت علمی گروه‌های علوم تربیتی دانشگاه‌های جامع سطح اول کشور، در سال تحصیلی 1402-1401 برابر با 244 نفر بود که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چند مرحله‌ای، 150 نفر انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها در بخش کیفی، مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته و در بخش کمی پرسشنامه محقق ساخته بود. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها در بخش کیفی از روش کدگذاری تحلیل مضمون و به منظور اعتباریخشی داده‌ها، از روش کینگ و هاروکس استفاده شد و در بخش کمی از روش آماری مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم‌افزارPLS  استفاده گردید.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های بخش کیفی نشان داد که در مجموع 142 کد اولیه، 32 مضمون پایه، 11 مضمون سازمان‌دهنده و 4 مضمون فراگیر شامل: «پیامدهای برنامه درسی پاسخگو»، «راهبردهای برنامه درسی پاسخگو»، «عوامل بازدارنده توسعه برنامه درسی پاسخگو» و «عوامل تسهیل‌کننده توسعه برنامه درسی پاسخگو» شناسایی شدند. نتایج بخش کمی نشان داد که مدل ارائه شده برای برنامه درسی پاسخگوی دوره کارشناسی علوم تربیتی در دانشگاه‌های جامع برتر کشور شامل مولفه‌های تشکیل دهنده سازه خود می‌باشد و لذا مدل ارائه شده از اعتبار و برازش مطلوبی برخوردار است.
نتیجه‌گیری: هرگونه اقدام و سیاست‌گذاری برای حرکت به سمت و سوی برنامه درسی پاسخگو نیازمند نگاه نظام‌مند و چندبعدی با در نظر گرفتن تمامی عناصر و ابعاد ساختاری، فنی، راهبردی، فرهنگی، اجتماعی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Modeling a Responsive Curriculum for the Field of Educational Sciences (Case Study: First-Level Comprehensive Universities in Iran)

نویسندگان [English]

  • ,Mohammadhassan Hassani 1
  • Haiedeh Ashouri 2
  • Fatemeh Ahmadbeigi 3
  • Marzieh Ramezani 3
1 PhD student, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: This study aimed to design and validate a responsive curriculum model for the Bachelor of Education degree in first-level comprehensive universities in Iran.
Method: In this study, a sequential exploratory mixed research method was used (qualitative approach of content analysis and quantitative approach of survey). The participants in the qualitative part of the research were faculty members who were experts and experts in the field of curriculum planning and experts in the field of higher education and university planning, of whom 18 people were selected as a purposive sample. Also, the statistical population in the quantitative part included all faculty members of the educational science departments of the first-level comprehensive universities of the country in the academic year 2022-2023, equal to 244 people, of whom 150 were selected using the multi-stage cluster sampling method. The data collection tool in the qualitative part was a semi-structured interview, and in the quantitative part, a researcher-made questionnaire. For qualitative data analysis, thematic analysis coding method was used, and for data validation, the King and Harrox method was used. For quantitative data analysis, the statistical method of structural equation modeling using PLS software was used.
Results: The findings of the qualitative section showed that a total of 142 primary codes, 32 basic themes, 11 organizing themes, and 4 overarching themes were identified, including: "Responsive Curriculum Outcomes", "Responsive Curriculum Strategies", "Responsive Curriculum Development Barriers", and "Responsive Curriculum Development Facilitators". The results of the quantitative section showed that the model presented for the curriculum of the Bachelor of Education course in the country's top comprehensive universities includes the components that make up its structure, and therefore the presented model has good validity and fit.
Conclusion: Any action and policy-making to move towards a responsive curriculum requires a systematic and multidimensional view, taking into account all structural, technical, strategic, cultural, and social elements and dimensions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • curriculum
  • educational science
  • responsive curriculum
  • responsive university
Abedi Jafari, H., Taslimi, M., Faghihi, A., & Shekhzadeh, M. (2012). Thematic Analysis and Thematic Networks: A Simple and Efficient Method for Exploring Patterns Embedded in Qualitative Data Municipalities). Sterategic Management Thought, 5(2), 151-198. [in Persian].
Ali Mohammad Lou, M., Akbari, B & Mahdavianpour, E. (2014), Identifying Social Responsibility in Universities (USR) Using Fuzzy Delphi. Case study: Shiraz University. Ihej, 6(3), 161-192. [In Persian].
Altbach, P. G. (2004). The Costs and Benefits of World-Class Universities. Academe, 90(1), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/40252583
Aminkhandaghi, M. and Pakmehr, H. (2013). Domination of Disciplinary Tradition over Guidance School of Art Teachers' Art Curriculum Orientation: Challenges and Damages. New Educational Approaches8(1), 21-46. [In Persian].
Angreani, L. S., & Vijaya, A. (2017). Designing an Effective Collaboration using Information Technology Towards World Class University. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 577-584.‏
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
Azizi, N. A. (2006). An Introduction to Higher Education in Iran with Emphasis on Humanities. Tehran: Institute of Cultural and Social Studies. [In Persian].
Azizi, N. A. (2014). Higher education and learner economics: the expectations of knowledge-based economic and industrial systems from the university. In M. Yemeni (Ed.), New Approaches and Perspectives in Higher Education. Tehran: Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. [In Persian].
Balaghat, S. R. (2011). Study of Humanities and its Interdisciplinary Fields Development Challenges in Iran: (The Case Study of Educational Science Course With 3 Lnterdisciplinary Fields, Comparative, Preschool and Primary Education. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities3(4), 117-129. doi: 10.7508/isih.2011.12.006. [In Persian]
Baradaran Haghir, M., Noorshahi, N. & Roshan, A. R. (2023). The conceptualization of social responsibility of the university in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education25(3), 1-26. [In Persian]
Beheshti, B., Safaei Movahed, S. and Bagheri, K. (2021). Inefficiency of Humanities in Iranian Universities, Based on Students' Lived Experience; A Phenomenological Research. Journal of Science and Technology Policy14(2), 67-80. doi: 10.22034/jstp.2021.14.2.1349, [In Persian]
Chan, S. J., & Lin, L. W. (2015). Massification of higher education in Taiwan: Shifting pressure from admission to employment. Higher education policy28, 17-33.‏
Danaeifard, H; Alvani, M & Azar, A. (1400). Qualitative Research Methodology in Management: A Comprehensive Approach, Tehran: Saffar Publications.
Farzaneh, M., Zeinabadi, H., Naveh ebrahim, A. & Abdollahi, B. (2023). Extracurricular Responsibilities of Faculty Members in the Context of a World-Class University: Introducing the Concept of Scientific Extraversion. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System16(1), 65-96. doi: 10.48308/mpes.2023.103237
Fathi, K., Ebrahimzadeh, E., Farajolahi, M., & Khoshnodifar, M. (2011). Curriculum Internationalization in Iran’s Higher Education: A Distant Education Perspective. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration2(6), 77-106.
Fathi Vajargah, K. (2015). Basic Principles and Concepts of Curriculum Planning, Tehran: Alam Ostadan Publications.
Fomunyam, K. G., & Teferra, D. (2017). Curriculum responsiveness within the context of decolonisation in South African higher education.‏ Perspectives in Education, 35(2), 196-207.
Hariri, N. (2011). Principles and Methods of Qualitative Research. Tehran: Principles and Methods of Qualitative Research. [In Persian]
Hatami, J. (2016). The challenge of teaching humanities in Iranian universities: a qualitative study. Journal of Research in Educational Systems10(32), 234-273. [In Persian]
Hennemann, S., & Liefner, I. (2010). Employability of German geography graduates: The mismatch between knowledge acquired and competences required. Journal of Geography in Higher Education34(2), 215-230.‏
Holm-Nielsen, L. B. (2013). Making a Strong University Stronger: Change without a Burning Platform. In Q. Wang, Y. Cheng and N. C. Liu (Eds), Building World-Class Universities: Different Approaches To A Shared Goal, (pp. 73- 87). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
Hosseinpour, M. (2012). The Research Pathology of Faculty Members in Human Sciences. Epistemological studies in Islamic University16(50), 45-64. [In Persian]
Jarvis, J. M. (2009). Planning to unmask potential through responsive curriculum: The “famous five” exercise. Roeper Review31(4), 234-241.‏
Keramati, M & Ansari, M. (2015). The employment status of graduates of educational sciences in Tehran University. National Congress of Higher Education of Iran. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/878284/fa [In Persian]
Khademi Kelelu, M., Khodayi, M., & Rahimi, B. (2023). Identifying and ranking barriers to employment of university graduates in the Iranian labor market, Journal of Social Problems of Iran, 13(2), 85-122. magiran.com/p2624330
Khosravi, E., salehi, A., Mahmoudnia, A., & Eimani Naeini, M. (2020). Indigenization of Educational Sciences in Iran, its Needs and Challenges, Irainian Journal of The Knowledge Studies in The Islamic University, 24(83), 289-308. magiran.com/p2184669 [In Persian].
King, N., Horrocks, C., & Brooks, J. (2018). Interviews in qualitative research: Sage.
Kumar, R., Karabenick, S. A., Warnke, J. H., Hany, S., & Seay, N. (2019). Culturally inclusive and responsive curricular learning environments (CIRCLEs): An exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology57, 87-105.‏
Leveille, D. E. (2005). An Emerging View on Accountability in American Higher Education. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE. 8.05. Center for Studies in Higher Education.‏
Maleki, D., Navehebrahim, A., Abdollahi, B., & Zeinabadi, H. (2023). Designing an Effective Accountability Model for Islamic Azad University: a qualitative approach based on Grounded Theory. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education26(4), 113-142. [In Persian].
Mohammadi Mehr, G. (2015). Content analysis method (practical research guide). Tehran: Danesh Negar Publishing. [In Persian].
Nazarzadeh Zare, M. (2016). Designing and Explaining a Pattern for the Competency of the Tehran University Faculty Members with Emphasis on International Interactions. (PhD of Higher Education Management). University of Tehran, Faculty of Psycology and Education. [In Persian]
Nili Ahmadabadi, M. R. (2009). Responsive Curriculum in Higher Education Case Study: Isfahan State Universities, PhD Thesis, University of Isfahan, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. [In Persian]
Nili, M., Nasr, A., Sharif, M., & Merhrmohammadi, M. (2010). Social Prerequisites and Outcomes of Accountable Curriculum in Higher Education Case Study: Public Universities of Isfahan. Journal of Applied Sociology21(2), 57-76. [In Persian]
Sarkar Arani, M. R. (2014). Self-renewal of faculty members. In M. Yemeni (Ed.), New Approaches and Perspectives in Higher Education (pp. 437-484). Tehran: Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. [In Persian].
Taqizadeh Kerman, N., Hosseinqolizadeh, R. and Javidi Kalate Ja’farabadi, T. (2015). A Pathological Study of Knowledge Creation in Humanities Research Centers. Strategy for Culture8(30), 161-188. [In Persian].
Thompson, R. A. (2013). Socioemotional development: Enduring issues and new challenges. Developmental Review13(4), 372-402.‏
Torkzadeh, J., & Nekoomand, S. (2015). Validating the scale of university's power of response to environment. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities5(8), 241-252.‏
Torkzadeh, J., parse, W., marzoghi, R., & mohammadi, M. (2020). framework of Responding to environment in higher education curriculum. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration11(45), 211-248. [In Persian]
Turkzadeh, J., & Keshavarzi, F. (2014). Changing and revising the curriculum of higher education with a strategic approach. Conference of the Iranian Curriculum Studies Association. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/844929/fa [In Persian]
Udvari-Solner, A., & Thousand, J. S. (2008). Creating a responsive curriculum for inclusive schools. Remedial and special education17(3), 182-191.‏
Vreuls, J., Koeslag‐Kreunen, M., van der Klink, M., Nieuwenhuis, L., & Boshuizen, H. (2022). Responsive curriculum development for professional education: Different teams, different tales. The Curriculum Journal33(4), 636-659.‏
Yamani, N. & Fakhari, M. (2014). Social Accountability of Medical Education Curriculum: Barriers and Implications, Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 13(12), 1082-1098. magiran.com/p1241000. [In Persian]
Yemeni Douzi Sorkhabi, M. (2001). An introduction to the performance of academic systems. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press. [In Persian]
  • تاریخ دریافت: 29 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 02 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 16 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 17 دی 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 خرداد 1405